Editorial Policy

Who is responsible

Content on this site is written and maintained by the AI Lead Magnet Hub editorial team, and bylines say so. The publisher, AI Lead Magnet Hub (aileadmagnethub.com), is responsible for everything we publish. We do not attach personal biographies or claim credentials, and no page claims review by a named expert.

Our aim is practical help for B2B consultants and small agencies: a page or resource should be useful before, and without, any buying decision.

Evidence and source rules

Statements a reader might rely on must trace to a source we can name.

• We cite primary sources where they exist, such as a vendor’s own pricing, documentation or terms page, with the date we retrieved them.
• We check that the cited passage actually supports our wording, including plan names and limits.
• We do not publish invented results, testimonials, reader quotes, ratings or statistics.
• Illustrative examples and hypothetical scenarios are labelled as such, never presented as client results.
• Unsupported numbers, comparisons and claims are narrowed, marked as unverified or removed.

How we use AI assistance

AI tools help us research, draft and edit our content. We say so plainly because it affects how you should read what we publish.

• Facts, prices and claims in AI-assisted drafts are checked against the sources we cite before publication.
• AI output is never treated as a source or as evidence in its own right.
• We do not use AI to produce testimonials, results, reviews or expert opinions.
• We do not claim human expert review or professional credentials for any page.

The sample campaign bundles and worked examples on our examples page were drafted with AI assistance, then edited and checked by the editorial team. The businesses, people and figures in them are fictional, and every one is labelled as an illustrative sample.

Corrections

If you think something is wrong or out of date, tell us.

We check each report against the source. If the page is wrong, we correct it. A substantive correction, one that changes a fact, price, claim or conclusion, is noted on the page with the date and a short description of what changed. Typos and broken formatting are fixed without a note.

Corrections log

Substantive corrections that affect more than one page are listed here, newest first.

• 19 October 2026: removed references to a planned AI workflow, a beta-interest form and proposed subscriptions that will not be offered; corrected the number of follow-up emails stated on the site to match what is sent; kept vendor prices, dated, on the two review pages only.

Updates and dates

• Pages show when they were published and when they were last updated. An update date means real editorial work was done.
• Prices and plan details are re-checked against the vendor’s current page before we quote them, and the retrieval date is shown with the source.
• We revisit a page when a product’s plans or features, our sources or the scope of the page change.
• Details we could not verify are identified as unverified rather than left to look certain.

Commercial relationships and editorial judgment

No affiliate links, sponsorships, paid placements or supplied access are active today. If that changes, the relationship will be disclosed next to the coverage it affects, as set out in our Affiliate Disclosure.

Commercial relationships never decide what we recommend. Editorial assessments explain the reader’s task, the evidence, the criteria, the benefits and the drawbacks. Affiliate approval says nothing about product quality or fit. Our own product, the Workflow Pack, is labelled as ours and judged by the same criteria.

Questions about this policy

For questions or concerns about these standards, use the contact form. You can read more about the publisher on our About page.